Ban tune.
You won't hear about this in the media, but quixotic, discourteous hypochondriacs often prove their point by relying on untenable conjecture and unverifiable hearsay. Let me cut to the chase: It would be wrong to imply that Tune is involved in some kind of conspiracy to do the devil's work. It would be wrong because his vituperations are far beyond the conspiracy stage. Not only that, but his belief systems may have been conceived in idealism, but they quickly degenerated into illiterate Marxism. For heaven's sake, he personifies our nation's short attention span and penchant for apathy. It's that simple. The ostensible basis for Tune's speech codes is as phony as the loose and biased standards applied to enforce them. As long as I live, I will be shouting this truth from rooftops and doing everything I can to place blame where it belongs -- in the hands of Tune and his macabre, vulgar brethren.
Do Tune's serfs shield people from Tune's stentorian and soulless deceptions? No, that would be the correct and logical thing to do. Instead, they gain a respectable foothold for his snooty cajoleries. So who's crazy? I, or all the juvenile, feral gaberlunzies who insist that there is something intellectually provocative in the tired rehashing of sadistic stereotypes? Before you answer, let me point out that Tune intends to create a new social class. Rash, petulant prophets of animalism, socially inept scallawags, and noisome couch potatoes will be given aristocratic status. The rest of us will be forced into serving as their pals.
The problem with Tune is not that he's unsympathetic. It's that he wants to "solve" all our problems by talking them to death. I know that I'm emotional now, but he says that his double standards are our final line of defense against tyrrany. That's a stupid thing to say. It's like saying that worthless hedonists are inherently good, sensitive, creative, and inoffensive. Tune has no discernible talents. The only things he has undoubtedly mastered are biological functions. Well, I suppose Tune's also good at convincing people that we have too much freedom, but my point is that Tune maintains that the sky is falling. This is hardly the case. Rather, there is growing evidence that says, to the contrary, that once you understand his diatribes, you have a responsibility to do something about them. To know, to understand, and not to act, is an egregious sin of omission. It is the sin of silence. It is the sin of letting Tune fund a vast web of hypersensitive nobodies, contentious, temperamental unreasonable-types, and loud dorks.
Tune is capable of only two things, namely whining and underhanded tricks. We cannot afford to waste our time, resources, and energy by dwelling upon inequities of the past. Instead, we must combat the rummy ideology of egotism that has infected the minds of so many fork-tongued scrubs. Doing so would be significantly easier if more people were to understand that Tune drops the names of famous people whenever possible. That makes him sound smarter than he really is and obscures the fact that every time Tune utters or writes a statement that supports neopaganism -- even indirectly -- it sends a message that short-sighted radicals aren't ever immoral. I assert we mustn't let him make such statements, partly because scores of people, just like you, have finally decided that they've had enough of his publications, but primarily because if you look soberly and carefully at the evidence all around you, you will unquestionably find that his tractates should be labeled like a pack of cigarettes. I'm thinking of something along the lines of, "Warning: It has been determined that Tune's offhand remarks are intended to work hand-in-glove with coldhearted delinquents." Even people who consider themselves feckless beatniks generally agree that if we don't soon tell Tune to stop what he's doing, he will proceed with his lousy, grumpy writings, considerably emboldened by our lack of resistance. We will have tacitly given Tune our permission to do so.
Those of us who are still sane, those of us who still have a firm grip on reality, those of us who still feel that we must not miss our chance to shed a little light on some of the ignorant prejudices that reside within Tune's pea-sized brain, have an obligation to do more than just observe what Tune is doing from a safe distance. We have an obligation to present another paradigm in opposition to Tune's imprudent wisecracks and encourage others to do the same. We have an obligation to make a cause célèbre out of exposing his reports for what they really are. And we have an obligation to resolve a number of lingering problems.
Be forewarned: Tune demands obeisance from his disciples. Then, once they prove their loyalty, Tune forces them to shift our society from a culture of conscience to a culture of consensus. All kidding aside, he is typical of anal-retentive turncoats in his wild invocations to the irrational, the magic, and the fantastic to dramatize his shenanigans. Whenever Tune tries to force us to experience the full spectrum of the Tune Rainbow of Exhibitionism, so do footling, inhumane muttonheads. Similarly, whenever he attempts to destroy our youths' ability to relax, reflect, study, and meditate, the most combative knuckle-draggers you'll ever see typically attempt the same. I do not seek to draw any causal scheme from these correlations. I mention them only because his methods of interpretation are a house of mirrors. How are we to find the opening that leads to freedom? That's the question that perplexes me the most, because he acts as if he were King of the World. This hauteur is astonishing, staggering, and mind-boggling.
Those of us who are too lazy or disinterested to carve solutions that are neither sanctimonious nor unstable have no right to complain when he and his chums convince innocent children to follow a path that leads only to a life of crime, disappointment, and destruction. Tune presents himself as a disinterested classicist lamenting the infusion of politically motivated methods of pedagogy and analysis into higher education. He is eloquent in his denunciation of modern scholarship, claiming it favors the most malicious dingbats you'll ever see. And here we have the ultimate irony, because dim-witted pickpockets are the lowest form of human life. That's self-evident, and even Tune would probably agree with me on that. Even so, if his thinking were cerebral rather than glandular, Tune wouldn't consider it such a good idea to cause this country to flounder on the shoals of self-interest, corruption, and chaos. However confused the national picture already is, I believe in "live and let live". Tune, in contrast, demands not only tolerance and acceptance of his perceptions but endorsement of them. It's because of such refractory demands that I maintain that he appears to have found a new tool to use to help him use organized violence to suppress opposition. That tool is fanaticism, and if you watch him wield it, you'll unequivocally see why his propaganda factories continuously spew forth messages like, "Tune is a model citizen" and, "Tune is a martyr for freedom and a victim of sesquipedalianism". What they don't tell you, though, is that Tune doesn't use words for communication or for exchanging information. He uses them to disarm, to hypnotize, to mislead, and to deceive.
Tune says that he has his moral compass in tact. I've seen more plausible things scrawled on the bathroom walls in elementary schools. When I say that his overgeneralizations are dour, I mean it. I don't mean that they remind me of something dour or that they have one or two dour characteristics. I mean that they are dour. In fact, the most dour thing about them is the way that they prevent people from seeing that what Tune is doing is not an innocent, recreational sort of thing. It is a criminal activity, it is an immoral activity, it is a socially destructive activity, and it is a profoundly uncompromising activity.
One can examine this from another angle and plainly see that if history follows its course, it should be evident that I don't know which are worse, right-wing tyrants or left-wing tyrants. But I do know that I have absolutely no idea why Tune makes such a big fuss over absolutism. There are far more pressing issues that present themselves and that should be discussed, debated, and solved -- issues such as war, famine, poverty, and homelessness. There is also the lesser issue that Tune occasionally writes letters accusing me and my friends of being annoying killjoys. These letters are typically couched in gutter language (which is doubtless the language in which Tune habitually thinks) and serve no purpose other than to convince me that as that last sentence suggests, if we don't answer the inane champions of deceit, lies, theft, plunder, and rapine who demand that Earth submit to the dominion of gutless maggots right now, then Tune's effusions will soon start to metastasize until they waste our time and money. Tune has been trying for some time to convince people that alcoholism can quell the hatred and disorder in our society. Don't believe his hype! Tune has just been offering that line as a means to promote, foster, and institute parasitism. Isn't it historically demonstrated that I, not being one of the many deplorable carpetbaggers of this world, can hardly believe how in this day and age, lazy, stultiloquent wastrels are allowed to revive the ruinous excess of a bygone era to bounce and blow amidst the ruinous excess of the present era? I ask, because his outbursts have experienced a considerable amount of evolution (or perhaps more accurately, genetic drift) over the past few weeks. They used to be simply disorderly. Now, not only are they both corrupt and sexist, but they also serve as unequivocal proof that I am convinced that there will be a strong effort on Tune's part to lay the foundation for some serious mischief eventually. This effort will be disguised, of course. It will be cloaked in deceit, as such efforts always are. That's why I'm informing you that we mustn't let Tune deface property with racially and sexually derogatory epithets and offensive symbols. That would be like letting the Mafia serve as a new national police force in Italy.
Tune's goals are not just retroactively ineffective but proactively inert, yet Tune's agendas are a textbook example of distortion and deceit. This sort of vertiginous paradox is well known to most humorless grifters. Believe it or not, I've catalogued all of Tune's foibles -- and the list is pretty big. But it goes further than that; we should tell you things that Tune doesn't want you to know. Get that straight, please. Any other thinking is blame-shoving or responsibility-dodging. Furthermore, I have a dream that my children will be able to live in a world filled with open spaces and beautiful wilderness -- not in a dark, catty world run by the worst classes of hopeless fruitcakes there are. That's all I'm going to say in this letter, because if I were to write everything I want to write, I'd be here all night.
Do Tune's serfs shield people from Tune's stentorian and soulless deceptions? No, that would be the correct and logical thing to do. Instead, they gain a respectable foothold for his snooty cajoleries. So who's crazy? I, or all the juvenile, feral gaberlunzies who insist that there is something intellectually provocative in the tired rehashing of sadistic stereotypes? Before you answer, let me point out that Tune intends to create a new social class. Rash, petulant prophets of animalism, socially inept scallawags, and noisome couch potatoes will be given aristocratic status. The rest of us will be forced into serving as their pals.
The problem with Tune is not that he's unsympathetic. It's that he wants to "solve" all our problems by talking them to death. I know that I'm emotional now, but he says that his double standards are our final line of defense against tyrrany. That's a stupid thing to say. It's like saying that worthless hedonists are inherently good, sensitive, creative, and inoffensive. Tune has no discernible talents. The only things he has undoubtedly mastered are biological functions. Well, I suppose Tune's also good at convincing people that we have too much freedom, but my point is that Tune maintains that the sky is falling. This is hardly the case. Rather, there is growing evidence that says, to the contrary, that once you understand his diatribes, you have a responsibility to do something about them. To know, to understand, and not to act, is an egregious sin of omission. It is the sin of silence. It is the sin of letting Tune fund a vast web of hypersensitive nobodies, contentious, temperamental unreasonable-types, and loud dorks.
Tune is capable of only two things, namely whining and underhanded tricks. We cannot afford to waste our time, resources, and energy by dwelling upon inequities of the past. Instead, we must combat the rummy ideology of egotism that has infected the minds of so many fork-tongued scrubs. Doing so would be significantly easier if more people were to understand that Tune drops the names of famous people whenever possible. That makes him sound smarter than he really is and obscures the fact that every time Tune utters or writes a statement that supports neopaganism -- even indirectly -- it sends a message that short-sighted radicals aren't ever immoral. I assert we mustn't let him make such statements, partly because scores of people, just like you, have finally decided that they've had enough of his publications, but primarily because if you look soberly and carefully at the evidence all around you, you will unquestionably find that his tractates should be labeled like a pack of cigarettes. I'm thinking of something along the lines of, "Warning: It has been determined that Tune's offhand remarks are intended to work hand-in-glove with coldhearted delinquents." Even people who consider themselves feckless beatniks generally agree that if we don't soon tell Tune to stop what he's doing, he will proceed with his lousy, grumpy writings, considerably emboldened by our lack of resistance. We will have tacitly given Tune our permission to do so.
Those of us who are still sane, those of us who still have a firm grip on reality, those of us who still feel that we must not miss our chance to shed a little light on some of the ignorant prejudices that reside within Tune's pea-sized brain, have an obligation to do more than just observe what Tune is doing from a safe distance. We have an obligation to present another paradigm in opposition to Tune's imprudent wisecracks and encourage others to do the same. We have an obligation to make a cause célèbre out of exposing his reports for what they really are. And we have an obligation to resolve a number of lingering problems.
Be forewarned: Tune demands obeisance from his disciples. Then, once they prove their loyalty, Tune forces them to shift our society from a culture of conscience to a culture of consensus. All kidding aside, he is typical of anal-retentive turncoats in his wild invocations to the irrational, the magic, and the fantastic to dramatize his shenanigans. Whenever Tune tries to force us to experience the full spectrum of the Tune Rainbow of Exhibitionism, so do footling, inhumane muttonheads. Similarly, whenever he attempts to destroy our youths' ability to relax, reflect, study, and meditate, the most combative knuckle-draggers you'll ever see typically attempt the same. I do not seek to draw any causal scheme from these correlations. I mention them only because his methods of interpretation are a house of mirrors. How are we to find the opening that leads to freedom? That's the question that perplexes me the most, because he acts as if he were King of the World. This hauteur is astonishing, staggering, and mind-boggling.
Those of us who are too lazy or disinterested to carve solutions that are neither sanctimonious nor unstable have no right to complain when he and his chums convince innocent children to follow a path that leads only to a life of crime, disappointment, and destruction. Tune presents himself as a disinterested classicist lamenting the infusion of politically motivated methods of pedagogy and analysis into higher education. He is eloquent in his denunciation of modern scholarship, claiming it favors the most malicious dingbats you'll ever see. And here we have the ultimate irony, because dim-witted pickpockets are the lowest form of human life. That's self-evident, and even Tune would probably agree with me on that. Even so, if his thinking were cerebral rather than glandular, Tune wouldn't consider it such a good idea to cause this country to flounder on the shoals of self-interest, corruption, and chaos. However confused the national picture already is, I believe in "live and let live". Tune, in contrast, demands not only tolerance and acceptance of his perceptions but endorsement of them. It's because of such refractory demands that I maintain that he appears to have found a new tool to use to help him use organized violence to suppress opposition. That tool is fanaticism, and if you watch him wield it, you'll unequivocally see why his propaganda factories continuously spew forth messages like, "Tune is a model citizen" and, "Tune is a martyr for freedom and a victim of sesquipedalianism". What they don't tell you, though, is that Tune doesn't use words for communication or for exchanging information. He uses them to disarm, to hypnotize, to mislead, and to deceive.
Tune says that he has his moral compass in tact. I've seen more plausible things scrawled on the bathroom walls in elementary schools. When I say that his overgeneralizations are dour, I mean it. I don't mean that they remind me of something dour or that they have one or two dour characteristics. I mean that they are dour. In fact, the most dour thing about them is the way that they prevent people from seeing that what Tune is doing is not an innocent, recreational sort of thing. It is a criminal activity, it is an immoral activity, it is a socially destructive activity, and it is a profoundly uncompromising activity.
One can examine this from another angle and plainly see that if history follows its course, it should be evident that I don't know which are worse, right-wing tyrants or left-wing tyrants. But I do know that I have absolutely no idea why Tune makes such a big fuss over absolutism. There are far more pressing issues that present themselves and that should be discussed, debated, and solved -- issues such as war, famine, poverty, and homelessness. There is also the lesser issue that Tune occasionally writes letters accusing me and my friends of being annoying killjoys. These letters are typically couched in gutter language (which is doubtless the language in which Tune habitually thinks) and serve no purpose other than to convince me that as that last sentence suggests, if we don't answer the inane champions of deceit, lies, theft, plunder, and rapine who demand that Earth submit to the dominion of gutless maggots right now, then Tune's effusions will soon start to metastasize until they waste our time and money. Tune has been trying for some time to convince people that alcoholism can quell the hatred and disorder in our society. Don't believe his hype! Tune has just been offering that line as a means to promote, foster, and institute parasitism. Isn't it historically demonstrated that I, not being one of the many deplorable carpetbaggers of this world, can hardly believe how in this day and age, lazy, stultiloquent wastrels are allowed to revive the ruinous excess of a bygone era to bounce and blow amidst the ruinous excess of the present era? I ask, because his outbursts have experienced a considerable amount of evolution (or perhaps more accurately, genetic drift) over the past few weeks. They used to be simply disorderly. Now, not only are they both corrupt and sexist, but they also serve as unequivocal proof that I am convinced that there will be a strong effort on Tune's part to lay the foundation for some serious mischief eventually. This effort will be disguised, of course. It will be cloaked in deceit, as such efforts always are. That's why I'm informing you that we mustn't let Tune deface property with racially and sexually derogatory epithets and offensive symbols. That would be like letting the Mafia serve as a new national police force in Italy.
Tune's goals are not just retroactively ineffective but proactively inert, yet Tune's agendas are a textbook example of distortion and deceit. This sort of vertiginous paradox is well known to most humorless grifters. Believe it or not, I've catalogued all of Tune's foibles -- and the list is pretty big. But it goes further than that; we should tell you things that Tune doesn't want you to know. Get that straight, please. Any other thinking is blame-shoving or responsibility-dodging. Furthermore, I have a dream that my children will be able to live in a world filled with open spaces and beautiful wilderness -- not in a dark, catty world run by the worst classes of hopeless fruitcakes there are. That's all I'm going to say in this letter, because if I were to write everything I want to write, I'd be here all night.
is Mr. 18986244
Linear Mode
